Do not want to "star". Even in distant youth on the walls hung posters in my favorite bands, rather than reversal of Playboy beauties. "Wild Orchid" as the "nine and a half weeks," on my impressions are not producedat all. Much more interesting to watch as a young Stallone beats funny "terrible Russian", and a young Jackie Chan with incredible acrobatic humor stole something once again. And, of course, the German porn! Forbidden and the refore terribly terribly interesting. Especially on fast forward with the included image. It was like a sewing machine again, the German "Zinger." We, the then sixteen boys, it is quite amused. Yes, the names of female movie starsounded familiar, but not memorized.
Angelina Jolie and Jennifer Aniston appeared on our screens, of course, much later, when, and video shop has already passed away. For a long time, one I knew as Lara Croft, the other as the girl from "Friends." With the development of the global network of information and creativity, and about the personal life of each is more than enough. Yes and no, no cinema, and so will another masterpiece from the one or the other in the title or not the role. Who is better? Well, let's try something to compare, though, in my opinion, to compare the two women - like comparing the Egyptian pyramids, for example, Notre-Dame de Paris.
Superficially both are very attractive. The only thing that Angelina Jolie, in my opinion, all the charms too. Too plump lips, big eyes too, and so forth, although in general it is not spoiled. Hairstyle and hair color does not stand discussion - women of this level can change both the first and the second a few times a month, especially because of the profession. As for the well-groomed - so, in my opinion, it is too early to talk about it - a little over 40, the other is not even 40. And with their money look bad is just silly. That is it for 80 years, then we'll see. Summarizing, we can say is that apparently they look like, in fact, should look like "Star" at their age.
.jpg)
